Why Fluid Condensers sort of works

Launching on March 31st, Fluid Condensers is a nonfiction debut work from author Aerik Arkadian. It’s about a form of magic that is perhaps overlooked, but one that practitioners might realize they’re using on a regular basis.

I received an ARC copy from the publisher, Crossed Crow Books. What follows will be an honest review of what I liked about this book and what I didn’t. If you’re a witch like me, maybe you’ll want to check it out. If you’re a writer like me, you might learn something about writing a nonfiction book that people can’t put down.

(As an aside for my witchy followers, the forward for this book is from Christopher Penczak. He wrote one of my favorite witchcraft books, called City Magick. If you’re a witch like me who prefers city lights to a cabin in the woods, that book’s a must-read.)

The information is clear and understandable

Let’s start with the basics. The first reason to read a nonfiction book is usually to learn something. So the main goal for a nonfiction writer is to teach. To instruct. And in that sense, Fluid Condensers did a great job. It was incredibly informative about the topic at hand.

The topic, by the way, is the process of collecting and storing energy in a concoction that includes gold in some form. It’s alchemy, for those who don’t know.

Now, I am not an alchemist. So, this was a branch of magic I knew little to nothing about. But the information in this book was easy to understand. It was easy to follow, even from a novice’s perspective.

I learned things that I didn’t know, as a practicing witch of many years

And on this topic, I am, in fact, a novice. Even though I’ve been a practicing witch for years now, there are so many things I don’t know. Especially about the more alchemical aspects of magic making.

And this, in and of itself, is great. As I get older, it’s more and more rare to find something I know nothing about, literally.

This is something that, if you want to write a nonfiction book, you should strive for. Which I know can be difficult. There’s nothing new under the sun. But finding a niche topic that you’re knowledgeable about is a great thing. Not just for you, but for your readers as well.

We all want to learn something new.

This might not be the sort of book for you

All that being said, I didn’t love this book.

That’s largely on me. Witchcraft is a large tent, with so many different people interested in so many different branches and disciplines. And we all have our own fascinations.

I’m not, as I mentioned, an alchemist. I’m more of a ‘talks to trees, has tea with her ancestors, draws sigils on everything, lights too many candles, and makes friends with the Hat Man’ sort of witch. This is not that sort of witchcraft. It’s the sort that might be seen as more chemistry than charms. And that is some people’s catnip. Just not mine. So if you’re considering reading this book, keep that in mind.

This is also a good thing to remember for writers. Some people, even with the best of intentions, are not going to like your book. And it’s not necessarily because of anything you’ve done wrong. I could write the most fascinating book about the history of zombie fiction in Western PA, and if you aren’t interested in zombies, you aren’t going to give a shit about my book. Don’t take it personally.

It was rather dull

That being said, this wasn’t the most riveting book I’ve ever read. It was actually rather dull.

This, unfortunately, is on the part of the writer. This was not a provocatively written book. There was nothing in the word usage or topic that really caught my attention. It wasn’t overly engaging.

The writing was charming, don’t get me wrong. But, um, not at first. The writing at first was actually quite dry and dull.

And that’s a shame! Because as you get further into the book, Arkadian’s charm shines through. He is clearly a huge nerd. He is fascinated by the process of alchemy. He goes to music festivals and feels inspired to make alchemical concoctions that grab the amazing feelings that sort of events inspire.

Where was that inspired writing in the first few chapters? Why did this intro need to be so static, so devoid of personality?

Look, lots of people find alchemy boring. As far as magic is concerned, it’s rather a dull topic. What sells a nonfiction book about a less-than-riveting topic is the personality of the person who feels passionate about it. So a writer needs to sell us that personality right out of the gate. On the very first page, I need to know why this writer is so passionate about this specific topic.

The organization was poor, and that led to a rough read

That brings me to the biggest issue I had with this book. The organization was not great.

There are some interesting chapters in this book. I, personally, was fascinated by the history of gold. That was the part of the book that I ate up. It should have been earlier in the book. I would have been more invested.

A nonfiction book is not an obligatory read. We’re not in school anymore; nothing should feel like required reading. And, as people, we are first and foremost interested in people. So starting with the personality of the author is a good way to hook a reader. Then, explaining why the topic at hand is important to the author.

For instance, if I were writing a book about zombies in Western PA, I would start by explaining my love of George Romero. I would explain that he and I share a passion for Pittsburgh, even though neither of us was born here. This ties me emotionally to the subject at hand.

There was no sort of emotional connection in this book. And perhaps it’s just me, but that sort of connection hooks me. It makes everything else come alive.

So, in short, if you’re writing nonfiction, put more of yourself into the book. If by chance the author reads this, please don’t give up. Write more, write personally.

And if you’re interested in alchemy, check out Fluid Condensers. You’ll certainly learn a lot.

mjnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnLaunching on March 31st, Fluid Condensers is a nonfiction debut work from author Aerik Arkadian. It’s about a form of magic that is perhaps overlooked, but one that practitioners might realize they’re using on a regular basis.

I received an ARC copy from the publisher, Crossed Crow Books. What follows will be an honest review of what I liked about this book and what I didn’t. If you’re a witch like me, maybe you’ll want to check it out. If you’re a writer like me, you might learn something about writing a nonfiction book that people can’t put down.

(As an aside for my witchy followers, the forward for this book is from Christopher Penczak. He wrote one of my favorite witchcraft books, called City Magick. If you’re a witch like me who prefers city lights to a cabin in the woods, that book’s a must-read.)

The information is clear and understandable

Let’s start with the basics. The first reason to read a nonfiction book is usually to learn something. So the main goal for a nonfiction writer is to teach. To instruct. And in that sense, Fluid Condensers did a great job. It was incredibly informative about the topic at hand.

The topic, by the way, is the process of collecting and storing energy in a concoction that includes gold in some form. It’s alchemy, for those who don’t know.

Now, I am not an alchemist. So, this was a branch of magic I knew little to nothing about. But the information in this book was easy to understand. It was easy to follow, even from a novice’s perspective.

I learned things that I didn’t know, as a practicing witch of many years

And on this topic, I am, in fact, a novice. Even though I’ve been a practicing witch for years now, there are so many things I don’t know. Especially about the more alchemical aspects of magic making.

And this, in and of itself, is great. As I get older, it’s more and more rare to find something I know nothing about, literally.

This is something that, if you want to write a nonfiction book, you should strive for. Which I know can be difficult. There’s nothing new under the sun. But finding a niche topic that you’re knowledgeable about is a great thing. Not just for you, but for your readers as well.

We all want to learn something new.

This might not be the sort of book for you

All that being said, I didn’t love this book.

That’s largely on me. Witchcraft is a large tent, with so many different people interested in so many different branches and disciplines. And we all have our own fascinations.

I’m not, as I mentioned, an alchemist. I’m more of a ‘talks to trees, has tea with her ancestors, draws sigils on everything, lights too many candles, and makes friends with the Hat Man’ sort of witch. This is not that sort of witchcraft. It’s the sort that might be seen as more chemistry than charms. And that is some people’s catnip. Just not mine. So if you’re considering reading this book, keep that in mind.

This is also a good thing to remember for writers. Some people, even with the best of intentions, are not going to like your book. And it’s not necessarily because of anything you’ve done wrong. I could write the most fascinating book about the history of zombie fiction in Western PA, and if you aren’t interested in zombies, you aren’t going to give a shit about my book. Don’t take it personally.

It was rather dull

That being said, this wasn’t the most riveting book I’ve ever read. It was actually rather dull.

This, unfortunately, is on the part of the writer. This was not a provocatively written book. There was nothing in the word usage or topic that really caught my attention. It wasn’t overly engaging.

The writing was charming, don’t get me wrong. But, um, not at first. The writing at first was actually quite dry and dull.

And that’s a shame! Because as you get further into the book, Arkadian’s charm shines through. He is clearly a huge nerd. He is fascinated by the process of alchemy. He goes to music festivals and feels inspired to make alchemical concoctions that grab the amazing feelings that sort of events inspire.

Where was that inspired writing in the first few chapters? Why did this intro need to be so static, so devoid of personality?

Look, lots of people find alchemy boring. As far as magic is concerned, it’s rather a dull topic. What sells a nonfiction book about a less-than-riveting topic is the personality of the person who feels passionate about it. So a writer needs to sell us that personality right out of the gate. On the very first page, I need to know why this writer is so passionate about this specific topic.

The organization was poor, and that led to a rough read

That brings me to the biggest issue I had with this book. The organization was not great.

There are some interesting chapters in this book. I, personally, was fascinated by the history of gold. That was the part of the book that I ate up. It should have been earlier in the book. I would have been more invested.

A nonfiction book is not an obligatory read. We’re not in school anymore; nothing should feel like required reading. And, as people, we are first and foremost interested in people. So starting with the personality of the author is a good way to hook a reader. Then, explaining why the topic at hand is important to the author.

For instance, if I were writing a book about zombies in Western PA, I would start by explaining my love of George Romero. I would explain that he and I share a passion for Pittsburgh, even though neither of us was born here. This ties me emotionally to the subject at hand.

There was no sort of emotional connection in this book. And perhaps it’s just me, but that sort of connection hooks me. It makes everything else come alive.

So, in short, if you’re writing nonfiction, put more of yourself into the book. If by chance the author reads this, please don’t give up. Write more, write personally.

And if you’re interested in alchemy, check out Fluid Condensers. You’ll certainly learn a lot.

I launched a new website! If you like horror in all forms, check out Weird Wyrlds.

I started a new website!

Once upon a time, I wrote horror reviews for a site called Haunted MTL. It wasn’t a big site. It wasn’t terribly well-known. We had some business relationships, though. No one was sending us screeners of the latest A24 movies. But we were having fun.

And we had some terrific writers. Some terrific people. I was proud to be a part of this punk horror site.

Last year, Haunted MTL shuttered. And that really sucked. Not that I had a lot of time to be writing and reviewing things last year. But still, this was one of many losses that made 2025 suck just so much.

Some time ago, I was hanging out virtually with JM Brannyk. I was drinking, and we started talking about just how much 2025 sucked ass. And we both agreed that we missed working for Haunted MTL. I especially missed it when the new Dexter show came out.

During the course of our conversation, and while drinking some wine, we realized that nothing was stopping us from starting our own site.

So, that’s what we did.

Today, we’re launching Weird Wyrlds. This is a site for people who are looking for a good scary story. We’ll talk about scary movies, books, tv shows, podcasts and Youtube channels. And art. So much horror art.

Go check it out. I’ve already posted my review of The End Of The World as We Know It, a terrific horror collection inspired by Stephen King’s The Stand. There’s also some fantastic art from the wonderfully creative Jennifer Weigel. And a scary good review from JM Brannyk.

I really hope you love Weird Wyrlds. If you’re interested in all things creepy and eerie, I’m sure this is a place for you.

See you there.

Should writers be self-indulgent?

I was watching Micky Adkins a few weeks ago. I spend maybe too much time watching YouTube, but there we are. Micky’s great, you should check her out.

Of course, when I saw the title of this post, I had to watch it right away. (And by right away, I mean over the course of several days, because it was a three-hour-long video.) The title was, This BookTuber’s Vendetta Against Fanfiction Is Actually Pretty Sinister.

This video pissed me off so much that it actually inspired two different posts from me. Part two is coming soon. At some point, not sure when.

Look, I had Covid this week. Bear with me, everyone.

Now, Micky’s clear in this video that she is not a writer. So her opinions about this video are from a therapist’s perspective. But that’s okay, Micky. I am a writer. And I got you.

If three hours is too long a video for you, let me summarize it. It’s about another YouTube video from a channel I will not name, by a woman I will only call Hillary. Hillary doesn’t like fanfiction for many reasons. But the main reason for her hate seems to be that she finds fanfic to be self-indulgent. And Hillary thinks that self-indulgence is bad.

But is it? Let’s talk about it.

The dreaded Self-Insert

One of the biggest bugs up Hillary’s ass seems to be writers putting self-insert characters in their stories. You know, the sort of character that’s just clearly based on the author.

And that’s super cringy, right? Like, imagine if an author with a history of substance abuse issues and an absent father, who probably worried about being a good father, and lived in Maine, and was a teacher, wrote a lot of books about men with substance abuse issues who had terrible fathers, and lived in Maine, and taught. (Steven King)

Or like if a writer was a closeted lesbian who wanted to be a man her whole life, so she wrote about a closeted lesbian who wanted to be a man her whole life. (Louisa May Alcott)

Or if a writer got really into witchcraft and wrote a character who was really into witchcraft. (Me)

The point is that there’s actually nothing wrong with writing self-insert characters. I would argue that every character we write will have a little of ourselves in it. Even if we don’t mean to. We do it on purpose if we’re writing honestly. Our characters will reach for our favorite drinks. They’ll use our verbal idioms. We might even write them to look like us. That’s fine. So long as your characters are still as well-rounded as we can make these bags of bones, then go for it.

Oh no! I wrote about this super niche thing I like!

This is going to sound bitchy, but stick with me. We are not the precious little manic pixi individuals we think we are. Yes, every person is unique. Yes, every person is valuable as an individual and contains a whole universe of experiences that no one else can fully understand.

But we’re not that different. This is something that the internet has made clear to most of us. Any experience you’ve had, any joy or revolution, someone else has felt that too.

This means that if you write something that you really like, but you think it’s too niche for the rest of the world, you’re probably wrong. There’s probably someone out there, a lot of someones, who would really love to read your weird niche thing. So write about it, even if it seems self-indulgent.

I made art! Wait, I did it wrong?

Writing is art. We are artists, creating art. We are not producing a product.

There are no rules about art. There are techniques. There are widely accepted beliefs. And, I mean, of course, we have grammar rules. And spelling does count. But other than that, there are no rules.

You can write whatever you want. Your work doesn’t have to be super disciplined. It doesn’t have to follow traditional story structure. It doesn’t have to follow any agreed-upon structure. It can.

Art changes and evolves. What was considered standard a decade ago is passe now. And we as artists are allowed to shape how those changes come about by experimenting. Some might consider this part of our responsibility.

I’m a fan of what I wrote!

I know I’ve mentioned this before, but this seems like a good time to bring it up again. Writing a book takes so much time and work and passion and time and dedication and time. You have to love not just writing, but the writing that you specifically are doing. You have to be your story’s first and biggest fan. Because that love and devotion will get you through the days when it feels like you just can’t face the page. You just can’t take another round of editing.

This fandom will carry you through more than just the creation process if you let it. And that’s good, because you are going to have to champion your work to the world. You are going to have to be its biggest advocate. That’s easier if you, you know, like your book.

Wait, I’m actually a good writer?

So, what if you wrote something that’s super self-indulgent, but it turns out that it is, in fact, not good?

Maybe you wrote a really great sex scene, but it doesn’t really fit in your story.

Maybe you set a politician on fire in effigy, but that doesn’t make sense for your character to have done that.

Maybe you wrote this amazing description of the lush, gorgeous forest your character finds themselves in. Maybe you wrote three pages about it. In a row.

As you’re revising and editing your work, you’re going to work some of this stuff out for yourself. The longer you write, the more you edit your own work, the more you’ll see these things. Beta readers will also help you catch these moments.

Sometimes we have to kill our darlings. Sometimes we have to take out the things that don’t work for our story. Or kill off characters we’d rather live long lives.

Part of learning the craft of writing is learning what works and what doesn’t work. You know when it doesn’t work. You read it out loud, and it hurts your ears like an off-key melody. Or no matter how hard you try to make the storyline function, it won’t. Or you hate the character you’re supposed to love. Even if it hurts, you’ll know what needs to go.

These are all considerations for later drafts, though. When you’re rough-drafting, don’t worry about it. Throw everything in. Figure out what works later. Because, like you can’t see the whole painting in a brush stroke, you can’t tell if your self-indulgent scene works until the whole story is finished.

So, to sum it up, yes, your writing should be self-indulgent. You should write your story exactly how you want to write it. Give it the happiest ending. Write in that person you hate and evicerate them. Write smut. Craft a sappy love story that heals your specific wound. Skin a character.

Now look. I usually shy away from insulting other authors. And I’m not directly insulting Hillary. Even though sis went out of her way to insult a whole bunch of writers.

Writers who, as far as I can tell, are more prolific than she is. Whose work people like to read.

I’m not saying this to shame her or dunk on her. I am saying this because, for some reason I do not understand, she seems to be popular on YouTube. And I worry that some young writer might stumble upon her bullshit and feel bad about their writing. And if that’s you, let me say this with my whole chest.

Every single thing I have ever written has been very self-indulgent. I wrote Woven because I loved Tamora Pierce and wanted to write about thread crafts in magic. I wrote Quiet Apocalypse because I love haunted house stories and wanted to write about a modern witch. I’ve written and published nine books. I will, God willing, keep right on writing and publishing.

Hillary has published one. Do with that information what you will. And maybe, going forward, she should keep her eyes on her own work.

If you love what we do here and want to support Paper Beats World, please like and share this post. You can also support us financially on Ko-fi.

Want a free book? Check out Seeming, book one of Station 86.

A WordPress.com Website.

Up ↑